Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Off topic programming thread
From: Bill Weiss <houdini () nmt edu>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 01:56:27 -0700
Mortis(m0rtis () adelphia net)@Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 02:00:30AM -0500:
How many people are on the list? How much time does it take to read a message? What's their time worth? I have minimum math skills, but I think I can do this one. 1 person * 1 minute * $60/hr/person = $6. OMG, did I do that right? $6000 for every 1000 subscribers. Plus most of the list makes a lot more than that. Especially in business terms where you at least double the salary costs. You guys suck.
1 minute at $60/hr is $1 / minute (1 min * 60 $/hour / 60 min/hour = $1)
Back to your thread:BRETT: Are you trying to say that the standard library is badly written?I will say it. Your risk management system is shoddy as well. Not that I'm blaming you. Been there. Done that. Felt the pain. Probably do it again. It's poor quality. Tell the truth.
From the sounds of it, no.
You only need to validate data at the times it can change. If his app validates at input (and stuff can't change, natch), then there's no need to revalidate. Sanity overrules dogma, sometimes. -- Bill Weiss Since September 2002, the United States is the only country in the world where 60 per cent of the population believes that Iraq is an imminent threat - something that people do not believe even in Kuwait or Iran. -- Noam Chomsky _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security, (continued)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Bruce Ediger (Oct 26)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Stormwalker (Oct 27)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Bill Royds (Oct 27)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Bruce Ediger (Oct 27)
- Message not available
- Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Paul Schmehl (Oct 26)
- RE: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Chris Eagle (Oct 26)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Brett Hutley (Oct 26)
- RE: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Chris Eagle (Oct 26)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Brett Hutley (Oct 26)
- Off topic programming thread Mortis (Oct 26)
- Re: Off topic programming thread Bill Weiss (Oct 27)
- Re: Off topic programming thread Chris Smith (Oct 27)
- RE: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Paul Schmehl (Oct 26)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Bill Royds (Oct 26)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 26)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Brett Hutley (Oct 26)
- RE: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Chris Eagle (Oct 26)
- RE: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Steve Wray (Oct 27)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Gregory A. Gilliss (Oct 27)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 28)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Gregory Steuck (Oct 28)