Re: RE: Linux (in)security

["Mr. Rufus Faloofus" <foofus () foofus net>]

On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 04:10:53PM -0400, Arcturus wrote:
[snip]
> In lieu of securing the actual box, we put a firewall (running linux/unix)
> in front of it.  Then, we use a simple approach of "that which is not
> expressly allowed, is expressly denied" in our policies, and voila.
> Secured.

It might be better to say "protected from attacks sourced
from the other side of the firewall and directed at ports 
that we filter."

[snip]
> Just for the record, this was written in Outlook, and sent out via a secured
> system, that happens to run a Microsoft OS.  

I'd never have guessed:
> "It's not the OS, it’s the operator"

--Foofus.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html