Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: AT&T early warning system


From: S G Masood <sgmasood () yahoo com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 12:07:14 -0700 (PDT)


--- Hoho <hoho () tacomeat net> wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 22:44, jkm wrote:
Quote 2:
"AT&T saw anomalies in its network three to four
weeks before that worm
hit and was able to take certain precautions.
"When the worm actually
happened, AT&T's network did not take a hit,''
Eslambolchi said."


Doesn't it seem like they're trying to violate
causality? If the worm
doesn't exist yet, then its associated traffic
doesn't exist yet, hence
there's nothing to detect.


...unless they had insider information that a worm
that exploits certain "anomalies" would be released in
"three to four weeks" :).
I didn't see the original article but maybe they are
referring to the DCOM worm brigade which was
anticipated and awaited weeks before it hit.


--
S.G.Masood
Hyderabad,
India.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: