RE: Destroying PCs remotely?

["JT" <ptourvi1 () twcny rr com>]

Shawn, I fail to see your correlation. If they used those weapons without
just cause then yes, of course, it would violate the constitution. That's
why we have that nice thing called due process in the first place.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com 
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of 
> Shawn McMahon
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:50 AM
> To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Destroying PCs remotely?
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:19:49PM +0100, John.Airey () rnib org uk said:
> > Whilst this seems a little off-topic, having the US 
> government blowing up
> > your PC (without "due process" by the looks of it) makes 
> other security
> > holes pale into insignificance.
> >
> > More details at 
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/music> /2999780.stm
> >
>
> > What was that? It was the US constitution 
> saying bye-bye...
>
> What an asinine statement.  They have weapons that will destroy your
> body, too; does that violate the Constitution?
>
> Get back to me about our government when you guys repeal the Official
> Secrets Act, m'kay?
>
>
> -- 
> Shawn McMahon     | Let every nation know, whether it wishes 
> us well or ill,
> EIV Consulting    | that we shall pay any price, bear any 
> burden, meet any
> UNIX and Linux          | hardship, support any friend, 
> oppose any foe, to assure
> http://www.eiv.com| the survival and the success of liberty. - JFK

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html