Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c)

[Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>]

Chris Paget wrote:
> Personally, I'm tempted to set up my firewall to NAT incoming requests on port
> 135 to either www.metasploit.com or www.xfocus.org.  I know this is the
> full-disclosure list, but working exploit code for an issue this huge is taking
> it a bit far, especially less than 2 weeks after the advisory comes out.

IMHO releasing the exploit is ethical and legal.
The root of the problem is m$, they should take responsibility for the worms.
IIRC the m$ EULA states something like "the product is not fit for any purpose". 
So the exploit is consistent with the m$ EULA, I can't understand why you whine.
btw, Terry Pratchett has very good writings on IT EULA's and practices - check 
"Good Omens" and a disc world book mentioning a disorganizer.

georgi



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html