Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: Recommendations for a Passive Web Content Monitoring solution?


From: "Rapaille Max" <Max.Rapaille () nbb be>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 08:41:27 +0200

In the same way : Surfcontrol do it very nicely..  It is developped to block,  but has a nice repoting-only feature, 
extensives log and reports + classification.  Easy to install you can get a 30-day evluation..

Cheers

MAx

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Healy [mailto:jhealy+full-disclosure () logn net] 
Sent: jeudi 10 avril 2003 21:41
To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Recommendations for a Passive Web Content Monitoring solution?


At 1049992100s since epoch (04/10/03 14:28:20 -0400 UTC), Nick Jacobsen wrote:
I am not specifically looking for something that would trace it back 
to the employee, just something to give my client a good overview of 
most the surfing.

Couldn't you just use a forced (e.g., transparent) HTTP proxy?  I use Squid at home as a transparent proxy for all the 
machines on my network.  It keeps logs of all the URLs accessed, and I imagine there are tools to analyze the log files 
(otherwise, 2 minutes' worth of perl would get the logs into a form that you could analyze).

If you set it up for the network, you would be able to see all of the requests from the network.  As a side bonus, 
you'd probably get better connectivity from the caching...  =)

Jason

-- 
Jason Healy
http://www.logn.net/ _______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: