RE: Recommendations for a Passive Web Content Monitoring solution?

["Ed Carp" <erc () pobox com>]

Overkill.  Why not use squid, which is included with every Linux system?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com]On Behalf Of KF
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 5:12 AM
> To: Nick Jacobsen
> Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Recommendations for a Passive Web Content
> Monitoring solution?
>
>
> Snort?
>
> http://www.snort.org/cgi-bin/sigs-search.cgi?sid=porn
>
> -KF
>
>
> Nick Jacobsen wrote:
>
> > Not sure that this is an exactly suitable topic, but anything
> seems to go,
> > so...
> >
> > I am trying to find an open source (read free) PASSIVE web content
> > monitoring solution.  We are looking for something that can be put on a
> > network, and using promiscuous mode, capture and analyze web
> traffic, etc...
> > We would obviously place this in such a way that all network
> traffic would
> > pass by it.  Any suggestions would be welcome, though again, I am looking
> > for something specifically designed to do this, as I know I could modify
> > existing tools myself...
> >
> > Nick
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html