Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: 2nd Life
From: <Bonny_Allen () doh state fl us>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 11:05:59 -0500
I second that Timothy. Its obvious the poster "knobody" is unaware of the current trend, right or wrong, to perceive SL as a likely business tool - IMHO a parallel to all the politicians using MySpace and Facebook to attempt to reach voters. I am aware of industries that are using it to recruit and businesses that use it to conduct job interviews. It is always good to Google if one finds oneself lacking knowledge about, say "possible business uses of Second Life" before publicly making off the cuff negative (a kinda nasty to boot) remarks about another person's place of business. Examples I found: http://www.digitalfutureblog.org.nz/digital-strategy-v2/using-second-lif e-as-a-business-tool/ http://blog.worldvillage.com/games/a_second_life_quick_start_powerful_bu siness_tools_for_the_sl_newcomer.html Best, - Bonny ________________________________ From: firewall-wizards-bounces () listserv cybertrust com [mailto:firewall-wizards-bounces () listserv cybertrust com] On Behalf Of Timothy Shea Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 9:44 AM To: Firewall Wizards Security Mailing List Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] 2nd Life Your comments are troubling. What possible reason do you have to put down another organization or a person based on something you don't like? The guy is trying to do a job and your comments are helpful. I have worked for companies that have valid business reasons for all sorts of stupid and lame things. In the case of Second Life - one of the organizations I helped out in the last year had a marketing presence on Second Life. I have helped out or worked for organizations that an approved segment of the user base actively cruised porn sites. Why? Because they many of their best customers operated such sites (always paid on time and usually in cash). So please spare us your moral outrage. t.s On Nov 8, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Brian Loe wrote: On Nov 6, 2007 3:49 PM, DRISCOLL, ROBERT <ROBDRI () safeco com> wrote: Hello, I wanted to get some feedback on a request to allow Second Life through our network. I was hoping that perhaps someone has experience with this application and can let me know what steps they took to mitigate the risks. I'm sorry I can't offer any technical advice on this subject but I am dying to know what the possible business purpose for such access is?! If your posting e-mail address is an indication of the company you're doing this for... well, I'll keep that in mind when it comes to my next insurance purchase (I like the teensurance idea)! I'd feel bad if you got in trouble using your company e-mail address when posting here, and especially posting such comments. However, if you do get in trouble I think you'll have grounds for a lawsuit - after all, they would be recognizing the problem of you letting it be known that they have games running on their network which means they'd be recognizing how bad of an idea such access is. Unless, of course, there's some very interesting business need for it. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- 2nd Life DRISCOLL, ROBERT (Nov 07)
- Re: 2nd Life Brian Loe (Nov 09)
- Re: 2nd Life Timothy Shea (Nov 09)
- Re: 2nd Life Bonny_Allen (Nov 09)
- Re: 2nd Life Scott Pinzon (Nov 09)
- Re: 2nd Life Dave Piscitello (Nov 12)
- Re: 2nd Life Timothy Shea (Nov 09)
- Re: 2nd Life Brian Loe (Nov 09)
- Re: 2nd Life Tim Shea (Nov 09)
- Re: 2nd Life Jim Seymour (Nov 10)
- Re: 2nd Life Paul D. Robertson (Nov 10)
- Re: 2nd Life R. DuFresne (Nov 10)
- Re: 2nd Life ArkanoiD (Nov 12)
- Re: 2nd Life Brian Loe (Nov 09)
- Re: 2nd Life Jim Seymour (Nov 10)
- Re: 2nd Life DRISCOLL, ROBERT (Nov 12)