Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Firewall scaling
From: rgolodner () infratection com
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 05:49:13 +0000
Sami, it also depends on what type of traffic you are jamming down theone wan link. If you have any type of mail server behind your firewall, you may move up to that 32000 ceiling real quick. Provide a little more information and this list will help you out. With that many users and not knowing traffic types or amounts it is hard to give you a decent rationale for your argument. Richard Golodner
-----Original Message----- From: Sami Ghourabi [mailto:sami.ghourabi () online-netsecurity com] Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 07:40 AM To: firewall-wizards () listserv cybertrust com Subject: [fw-wiz] Firewall scaling Hi List, I'm trying to convince management that a firewall that supports 32000 concurrent sessions is enough for an organization that has a single WAN internet link, and about 60-100 users, but I'm lacking arguments. What do you think about that statement? Are there any rational methods available for firewall performance scaling (concurrent sessions, new sessions per second, throughput, etc.) Any answer/resource appreciated. Best Regards. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Firewall scaling Sami Ghourabi (Jun 26)
- Re: Firewall scaling Marcus J. Ranum (Jun 27)
- Re: Firewall scaling sin (Jun 27)
- Re: Firewall scaling jason (Jun 27)
- Re: Firewall scaling Pollock, Joseph (Jun 27)
- Re: Firewall scaling jason (Jun 27)
- Re: Firewall scaling K K (Jun 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Firewall scaling rgolodner (Jun 27)
- Re: Firewall scaling Ian Searle (Jun 27)
- Re: Firewall scaling Keith A. Glass (Jun 27)