Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Appropriate PIX logging level
From: ArkanoiD <ark () eltex net>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 23:43:43 +0400
nuqneH, Well, does that mean that syslog should be either not reliable (generic datagram), not portable enough (sdsc), buggy (nsyslogd) or suffering performance problems (ng) ;-)? On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 03:26:48PM -0400, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
ArkanoiD wrote:?hecked out if there are any news on sdsc syslog, nothing for last 3 years :-(Software that is over-complex for a relatively simple problem, deserves to die. I know a lot of people worked on it (which was part of the problem!) and worked hard, but - come on - it's only syslog. mjr.
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Marcus J. Ranum (May 02)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level David Lang (May 02)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Marcus J. Ranum (May 02)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level David Lang (May 02)
- minirsyslogd (was Appropriate PIX logging level) Bennett Todd (May 04)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level ArkanoiD (May 04)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Marcus J. Ranum (May 04)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level ArkanoiD (May 04)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Marcus J. Ranum (May 04)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Brian Loe (May 05)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Marcus J. Ranum (May 02)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Chuck Swiger (May 05)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level ArkanoiD (May 05)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Chuck Swiger (May 05)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level ArkanoiD (May 05)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level David Lang (May 02)
- RE: Appropriate PIX logging level David Lang (May 04)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Tichomir Kotek (May 05)