Re: Appropriate PIX logging level

[Miha Vitorovic <mvitorovic () nil si>]

firewall-wizards-admin () honor icsalabs com wrote on 26.04.2006 22:18:14:

> Well, that's .497 entries per second; you system can handle that 
> load, I bet!!! :)
> Why not just put something in front of your logging routines that 
> filters out the
> "junk" with a blacklist before letting it into the log? If you like 
> massive overkill
> you could use syslog-ng and zap the stuff with a pattern, but this is 
more a
> job for a 10 line C program or a 5 line perl program.

If anyone isn't aware (and I hope it isn't somewhere earlier in the 
thread) PIX also supports

"no logging message <message_number>"

command for filtering any messages with 0 bit information.

Regards, Mike
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards