Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Why are developers choosing to...
From: "Behm, Jeffrey L." <BehmJL () bvsg com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:43:56 -0600
On Friday, January 20, 2006 1:41 PM, Paul D. Robertson so spake:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Joseph S D Yao wrote:panic recently that their special app on port 7777 was not being
allowed
through a firewall. Turned out it was a Web app. Grumble.I feel your pain.
Hence my original question... Glad (I suppose) to hear that I'm not alone. Now...What wording do you use when (if) you inform "vendors" who have coded such web-apps on non-standard ports? My plea's seem to fall on deaf (or perhaps, dumb) ears. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: Why are developers choosing to..., (continued)
- Re: Why are developers choosing to... Karl Mueller (Jan 20)
- Re: Why are developers choosing to... Adrian Grigorof (Jan 20)
- Re: Why are developers choosing to... Greg Spath (Jan 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Why are developers choosing to... hermit921 (Jan 20)
- Re: Why are developers choosing to... Paul D. Robertson (Jan 20)
- Re: Why are developers choosing to... hermit921 (Jan 20)
- Re: Why are developers choosing to... Darren Reed (Jan 20)
- Re: Why are developers choosing to... mlh (Jan 23)
- Re: Why are developers choosing to... Barney Wolff (Jan 23)
- Re: Why are developers choosing to... Keith A. Glass (Jan 20)
- Re: Why are developers choosing to... Greg Spath (Jan 20)
- RE: Why are developers choosing to... Behm, Jeffrey L. (Jan 20)
- RE: Why are developers choosing to... Behm, Jeffrey L. (Jan 20)