Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Hopefully not too OT
From: David Thiel <lx () redundancy redundancy org>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 11:02:45 -0700
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 07:29:48AM +0000, jimmy () chickenhollow net wrote:
I have been pondering putting an 802.11 jammer on site at each location (again, we don't use wireless, so it should not impair anything) and thought that might be a cheaper option.
I thought about that too, but it also occurred to me that the company downstairs might not appreciate it. I suspect You could easily run into some legal problems doing wireless jamming. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Hopefully not too OT jimmy (May 02)
- Re: Hopefully not too OT David Thiel (May 02)
- Management, Security and best practices for HSM & ATM networks Shimon Silberschlag (May 02)
- RE: Hopefully not too OT Ben Nagy (May 02)
- RE: Hopefully not too OT Marcus J. Ranum (May 02)
- Re: Hopefully not too OT Barney Wolff (May 03)
- Re: Hopefully not too OT Marcus J. Ranum (May 03)
- RE: Hopefully not too OT Marcus J. Ranum (May 02)
- Impeding wireless (was Re: Hopefully not too OT) Kevin (May 02)
- Re: Hopefully not too OT Paul D. Robertson (May 02)
- Re: Hopefully not too OT David Lang (May 02)
- RE: Hopefully not too OT Paul Melson (May 02)
- Re: Hopefully not too OT Jim MacLeod (May 05)