RE: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN

["Ben Nagy" <ben () iagu net>]

If you're assuming that your users will always write down passwords then the
token is  perhaps superior because the token will often be on a keyring and
not stolen at the same time as the laptop.

Mainly, though, the token protects against offline password brute-forcing -
I know you say you use strong passwords so perhaps the threat is low here.
Other organisations may not be so trusting. The attacker has ~1 minute with
a token versus PasswordLife with your system.

There are other advanatges for a very few people, like duress codes etc. Not
all that relevant.

Finally, my RSA token allows me to select my own "secret number" instead of
using the burned in PIN. That gets sent along with the token data each
login, and can be changed. YMMV, I don't sell RSA stuff. ;)

Perhaps a facile treatment, but I'm late...

Cheers,

ben

> -----Original Message-----
> From: firewall-wizards-admin () honor icsalabs com 
> [mailto:firewall-wizards-admin () honor icsalabs com] On Behalf 
> Of MHawkins () TULLIB COM
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 4:09 PM
> To: firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
> Subject: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN
>
> Hi people,
>
> Here's something I've been wondering for some time now.
>
> What is the value of hardware token with burned in PIN as compared to
> username password (when the password policy is forced strong)?
>
> We enforce strong password policy in our organization. So 
> when a user logs
> into the VPN, I am reasonably confident of the validity of the
> authentication mechanism. The only problem is if a user 
> writes down their
> password and keeps it with the laptop or PC. Even then, I am 
> confident that
> XX days later, the password will be different to what they 
> wrote down (ok
> they will just write the new one down).
>
> I fail to see the benefit of using hardware tokens that rely 
> on a one time
> set PIN number (which seems to be all of them). The one time 
> PIN burned into
> most USB tokens is almost guaranteed to be written down by dumb users
> (unfortunately of which there are many) and so the end result 
> is that the
> USB token, the PIN and the laptop are all in a nice handy 
> easy to steal
> location.
>
> I have searched long and hard for a token that can use a 
> username password
> combination along with the PIN but to no avail.
>
> Why are so many organizations intent on using 
> hardware/software tokens? What
> am I missing here?
>
> What solutions are out there that do not use a PIN but use some
> username/password combination along with the hardware/software token?
>
> Mike Hawkins

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards