Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: iso 17799
From: George Capehart <capegeo () opengroup org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 12:02:35 -0400
On Tuesday 13 July 2004 10:48, avraham shir-el (arthur sherman) allegedly wrote:
i hope i'm not opening a pandora's box here, but- i'm following this list for ~ a year now and haven't seen any mention of iso 17799. it's defined on their website as "a comprehensive set of controls comprising best practices in IS" i've seen lots on this list about best practices w/o any refrences to 17799. any opinions on it? or does the extremely noticable lack of attention say it all?
Avraham, A thoughtful perspective on 17799 can be found at: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/secpubs/otherpubs/reviso-faq.pdf Regards, George Capehart -- George W. Capehart "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -- RFC 1925 _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- iso 17799 avraham shir-el (arthur sherman) (Jul 15)
- Re: iso 17799 Rachel Rosencrantz (Jul 19)
- RE: iso 17799 Wes Noonan (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Bennett Todd (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Chuck Swiger (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Devdas Bhagat (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 George Capehart (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Chuck Swiger (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Paul D. Robertson (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 George Capehart (Jul 20)
- Re: iso 17799 Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Christine Kronberg (Jul 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: iso 17799 J. Oquendo (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Bennett Todd (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Dana Nowell (Jul 20)
- Re: iso 17799 Paul D. Robertson (Jul 21)
- Re: iso 17799 Dana Nowell (Jul 20)
- Re: iso 17799 Paul D. Robertson (Jul 21)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: iso 17799 Rachel Rosencrantz (Jul 19)