Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Re: iso 17799

From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr () ranum com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 17:33:28 -0400

Paul D. Robertson wrote:

As far as I can tell, ISO9000 only really worked for the ISO9000
consultants.  Can't see where 17799 is any different.


Well, as George Capehart points out, NIST thinks in
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/secpubs/otherpubs/reviso-faq.pdf
that Common Criteria are better.

I am trying to see if I can mash down REALLY hard on that particular
button of Paul's....

mjr. 

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

Current thread:

iso 17799 avraham shir-el (arthur sherman) (Jul 15)
- Re: iso 17799 Rachel Rosencrantz (Jul 19)
  - RE: iso 17799 Wes Noonan (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Bennett Todd (Jul 19)
  - Re: iso 17799 Chuck Swiger (Jul 19)
  - Re: iso 17799 Devdas Bhagat (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 George Capehart (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Chuck Swiger (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Paul D. Robertson (Jul 19)
  - Re: iso 17799 Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 19)
    - Re: iso 17799 George Capehart (Jul 20)
- Re: iso 17799 Christine Kronberg (Jul 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: iso 17799 J. Oquendo (Jul 19)
  - Re: iso 17799 Bennett Todd (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Dana Nowell (Jul 20)
  - Re: iso 17799 Paul D. Robertson (Jul 21)
    - Re: iso 17799 Dana Nowell (Jul 20)
  - Re: iso 17799 Devdas Bhagat (Jul 21)
    - Re: iso 17799 Paul D. Robertson (Jul 21)
  - Message not available
    - Re: iso 17799 Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 21)

(Thread continues...)