Re: tunnel vs open a hole

[Crispin Cowan <crispin () wirex com>]

Barney Wolff wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 02:59:37PM -0400, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
>  
>
> > Protocol-over-protocol "attacks" mooted firewalls a loooooooong time
> > ago. We've just been cheerfully ignoring that fact. I was tunnelling
> > IP packets uuencoded over smtp back in the early 1990's (I guess
> > it would have been 1993 or -4) and got good enough RTTs that I
> > could even NFS-mount filesystems across a firewall once I had
> > tuned the NFS timeouts and retries correctly.
> >    
> With all due respect, this is something of an overstatement.  Tunneling
> requires a cooperating agent on the inside.  The security policy of
> that agent becomes part of your firewall.
The scary "gotcha": what if the "cooperating agent" on the inside is a 
worm or a virus?

Crispin

--
Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.                      http://wirex.com/~crispin/
Chief Scientist, WireX                    http://wirex.com
HP/Trend Micro Immunix Secured Solutions
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/solutions/iis/
                            Just say ".Nyet"


_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards