Re: milter?

[ark () eltex ru]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

nuqneH,

Rainer Ginsberg <rainer.ginsberg () de bosch com> said :

> On 22.08.01 15:00 +0400 ark () eltex ru wrote:
>
> > Had a brief look at milter and got impression that it is not bad and
> > could be one  of possible CVP replacements. What do you all think about
> > it?
>
> I'm sorry, I don't know milter. Quickly looking at the web site
> makes me wonder if it's only working together with sendmail?
> Whereas CVP can possibly be used with other MTAs and even other
> protocols, e.g., HTTP.

For now - yes, but are there any fundamental reasons that can prevent 
compatible protocol from being used beyond that?

CVP is closed, proprietary and ugly.
Can you teach your favorite MTA to do CVP? I doubt so.
 
> On the other side, CVP is a performance bottleneck, especially
> for large sites. Maybe milter gives you better performance.
 

                                     _     _  _  _  _      _  _
 {::} {::} {::}  CU in Hell          _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
 (##) (##) (##)        /Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|
 [||] [||] [||]            Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.1i

iQCVAwUBO4Zh66H/mIJW9LeBAQEprwP/aHAFk9ZSYAdTRnrfTz2Y8H2gMkg40nXk
f29QBqiDtmGCldWxHd8XdTBx/yE34lWwselL+W+U4azTPA2QBEXDlTj5yJJxrB/r
Ea5IjFVX0jH6e7C6eyfFnVpFXuPaNrK30PoQNfPkBHTn5mZoNKLGIhkhH6u4vgVt
19X0H+iqLb8=
=UGNn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () nfr com
http://list.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards