Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: RE: High Speed Firewalls
From: Mikael Olsson <mikael.olsson () enternet se>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:26:02 +0100
Ryan Russell wrote:
I think at some point, your constraining factor might get to be latency. The window size can only get to be 64K, right?
Actually, no. The TCP Window Scaling option (WSOPT) defined in RFC 1323 can scale the window size up to 2^256 times. It was implemented to cope with the concept of "Long Fat Networks", meaning high throughput, high delays. Unfortunatelly, increasing the window size eats a hell of a lot of RAM on the sender end, so I don't know of many places that actually use it, and I don't know which OSes support it. I'd suspect a lot of *nix flavours do (atleast I keep seeing WSOPTs in their SYN packets), and that.. uhmmm. some big commercial OSes don't. $.02 and a bit OT, I know :-) /Mike -- Mikael Olsson, EnterNet Sweden AB, Box 393, S-891 28 ÖRNSKÖLDSVIK Phone: +46 (0)660 105 50 Fax: +46 (0)660 122 50 Mobile: +46 (0)70 66 77 636 WWW: http://www.enternet.se E-mail: mikael.olsson () enternet se
Current thread:
- Re: High Speed Firewalls, (continued)
- Re: High Speed Firewalls Rogue Bolo (Mar 07)
- RE: High Speed Firewalls Rogue Bolo (Mar 07)
- RE: High Speed Firewalls Woeltje, Donald (Mar 08)
- Re: RE: High Speed Firewalls Gregory Hicks (Mar 17)
- RE: RE: High Speed Firewalls David Newman (Mar 17)
- Re: RE: High Speed Firewalls Ryan Russell (Mar 21)
- RE: RE: High Speed Firewalls David Newman (Mar 21)
- Re: RE: High Speed Firewalls Crispin Cowan (Mar 21)
- RE: RE: High Speed Firewalls Ryan Russell (Mar 21)
- RE: RE: High Speed Firewalls David Newman (Mar 21)
- Re: RE: High Speed Firewalls Mikael Olsson (Mar 23)
- Re: RE: High Speed Firewalls Jonathan Rozes (Mar 28)
- RE: High Speed Firewalls David Newman (Mar 21)