Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Free NAT for NT?
From: Tyler Singletary <tyler () focus-vision com>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 10:46:09 -0700
Actually, MS is also pursuing IPv6. I have the website link here somewhere- I will post it when I find it. It's part of their college reachout program or some name like that. The point being, MS themselves are not developing it- they've contracted a Non-Profit college organization to develop it for the Windows (98/NT/2000) platform.
At 08:41 AM 9/8/99 +1000, Carl Brewer wrote:
I'm not coming down on Robert here! <rant> It's a shame that M$ are providing NAT, which even they know is a bad technology (it was a M$ employee that wrote the IETF case against NAT), and not IPv6. Please don't lose focus! NAT is a short-term ugly broken hack, push your vendor(s) for IPv6 support! http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iab-nat-implications-04.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts-ietf-iab-case-for-ipv6-04.txt If you're using, or worse, planning to use, NAT and you haven't read the above two documents, read them :) </rant> Carl > From owner-firewall-wizards () lists nfr net Wed Sep 8 08:32 EST 1999 > Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 14:20:07 -0700 (PDT) > From: Robert Graham <robert_david_graham () yahoo com> > Subject: Re: Free NAT for NT? > To: Ryan Russell <Ryan.Russell () sybase com>, firewall-wizards () nfr net > MIME-Version: 1.0 >> The new "Connection Sharing" feature in Win98 SE and Windows 2000 is based upon > NAT (created by a company called Nevod that was bought by M$, used to be called> NAT1000). In essence, this means that every Win98/Win2K is/will-be shipping > with a NAT. > > Check out these links: > http://www.uq.net.au/~zzdmacka/the-nat-page/nat_windows.html > http://www.alumni.caltech.edu/~dank/peer-nat.html >> Recently, I setup a Win2k "connection sharing" NAT and was able to port scan> the one machine behind it. Doesn't seem right. Anybody have experience with > this? > > Rob. > > --- Ryan Russell <Ryan.Russell () sybase com> wrote: > > Anyone aware of any free Network Address Translation (NAT) > > software for Windows NT? > > > > I'm writing a chapter on NAT, and the publisher is calling for examples > > in Linux, Cisco IOS, and NT. The first two are easy, but I'm only aware > > of commercial solutions for NT. (No, I'm not under the impression that> > the Cisco implementation is free, but since there is only one choice, it's> > a bit of a moot point.) > > > > I prefer free solutions, so that readers can obtain and play with the> > technology more easily. Barring that, I'll go after low-cost, or possibly> > higher-cost but with downloadable demo. > > > > Ryan > > > > > > > > === > Robert Graham > "Anxiously awaiting the millenium so I can start programming > dates with 2-digits again." > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com > >
D. Tyler Singletary Single Solutions singlesolutions () home com
Current thread:
- Free NAT for NT? Ryan Russell (Sep 06)
- Re: Free NAT for NT? Stefan Norberg (Sep 07)
- Re: Free NAT for NT? Christoph Schneeberger (Sep 07)
- Re: Free NAT for NT? Mailing Lists (Sep 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Free NAT for NT? Robert Graham (Sep 07)
- Re: Free NAT for NT? dwelch (Sep 07)
- Re: Free NAT for NT? Carl Brewer (Sep 07)
- Re: Free NAT for NT? Darren Reed (Sep 08)
- Re: Free NAT for NT? Tyler Singletary (Sep 08)
- Re: Free NAT for NT? Mikael Olsson (Sep 08)
- Re: Free NAT for NT? Darren Reed (Sep 09)
- RE: Free NAT for NT? LeGrow, Matt (Sep 08)
- Re: Free NAT for NT? Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 09)
- RE: Free NAT for NT? dwelch (Sep 10)
- RE: Free NAT for NT? Garman, Christopher (Sep 10)