Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

RE: FW-1 Failover


From: John McDonald <Johnm () Networkguys com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 11:42:52 -0700

I suggest Rainwall from Rainfinity. www.rainfinity.com
<http://www.rainfinity.com>   EXCELLENT product and we've have had
multiple successful installs with large DMZ's and multiple interfaces.
Very reliable and it's the only firewall fail-over software in the world
that allows for TRUE load balancing!

John D. McDonald 

Phone: 510.713.8880 ext. 306 
Fax:      510.713.3456 
E-mail: JohnM () NetworkGuys com
Web:    www.NetworkGuys.com

Elite Security Consulting 
              &
 Auditing Services

                -----Original Message-----
                From:   Kelvin Garrahan
[mailto:Kelvin.Garrahan () digital com]
                Sent:   Tuesday, June 22, 1999 4:13 AM
                To:     
                Subject:        FW-1 Failover

                eSafe Protect Gateway (tm) has scanned this mail for 
                viruses, vandals and suspicious attachments and has
found it 
                to be CLEAN.


                Hi all,

                I am thinking of using FW-1 for a internal Firewall
which will segregate
                four networks of different security levels. The
configuration is to be on
                NT, with four Ethernet cards. The choice of platform is
customer driven, my
                original plans where to use Cisco's PIX. The main
problem I have is
                providing failover for the FW-1. With PIX this is not a
problem. I know FW-1
                supports failover/load sharing, but will this work with
four interfaces?

                Has anyone any experience with creating resilience for
multiple DMZ FW-1
                configurations?

                Regards

                Kel.

                Kelvin Garrahan
                Internet Technologies Consultant.
                Network Services,
                Park House,
                N.C.R.,
                Dublin 7.
                > kelvin.garrahan () compaq com 
                > 
                > 

Current thread: