Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: ODBC in DMZ
From: sean.kelly () lanston com
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:46:18 -0400
From: Stefan Norberg [mailto:stnor () sweden hp com] C.K., ODBC is not a communications protocol. It relies on an underlying communications mechanism. For example: A client can access a MS SQL-server (using ODBC), via Named Pipes (yuck :P), MS RPC or TCP/IP Sockets (default port is 1433).
One other option for MS SQL is "MultiProtocol," the benefit of which is that it can be encrypted as opposed to cleartext (enforced by the server and/or client). I'm fairly sure that multi-protocol will run over a pure tcp/ip connection. Sean
Current thread:
- ODBC in DMZ C. K. Lung (Jul 14)
- Re: ODBC in DMZ Stefan Norberg (Jul 15)
- Re: ODBC in DMZ Matt McClung (Jul 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: ODBC in DMZ sean . kelly (Jul 15)
- Re: ODBC in DMZ Todd Johnson (Jul 15)
- RE: ODBC in DMZ C. K. Lung (Jul 15)
- Re: ODBC in DMZ Stefan Norberg (Jul 16)
- RE: ODBC in DMZ John McDonald (Jul 15)
- Re: ODBC in DMZ Sean Costello (Jul 16)
- RE: ODBC in DMZ sean . kelly (Jul 16)
- RE: ODBC in DMZ sean . kelly (Jul 16)