Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware
From: "tqbf" <ashland () pobox com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 16:24:10 -0400 (EDT)
it could reasonably be expected to check for is infinite. Scanners can never be complete, because the space of possible mis-configurations and buggy software knows no bounds.
You have a misconception about what a scanner is. The purpose of a scanner is no more to discover all possible misconfigurations and vulnerabilities than the purpose of a firewall is to stop all possible attacks. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thomas H. Ptacek Network Security Research Team, NAI ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- "If you're so special, why aren't you dead?"
Current thread:
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware, (continued)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Stephen P. Berry (Sep 06)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Marcus J. Ranum (Sep 03)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware emaiwald (Sep 03)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Dominique Brezinski (Sep 03)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Ryan Russell (Sep 03)
- RE: Penetration testing via shrinkware Gary Crumrine (Sep 03)
- RE: Penetration testing via shrinkware Christopher Nicholls (Sep 07)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware tqbf (Sep 17)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Crispin Cowan (Sep 18)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Ted Doty (Sep 19)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware tqbf (Sep 19)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Dave Whitlow (Sep 19)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Christopher Nicholls (Sep 19)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Adam Shostack (Sep 20)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Ivan Arce,CORE SDI (Sep 23)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware tqbf (Sep 21)
- RE: Penetration testing via shrinkware Christopher Nicholls (Sep 07)