Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: INtrusion Detection
From: Vern Paxson <vern () ee lbl gov>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 10:11:56 PST
I started a similar thread a few days ago on the IDS list ...
(Is that list still alive? I never unsubscribed, but haven't seen your post.)
One thing that I have noticed, is that we tend to deal in absolutes... A product has to meet x,y,z absolutely or it is considered BAD. I totally disagree with that thought stream ...
To my mind, the current IDS arguments/discussions are not about absolute security. They're instead in particular about vulnerabilities that can be exploited *by software alone*. Experience has proven it's vital to defend against these, as absolutely as possible, because of the speed with which exploit software can spread. Vern
Current thread:
- Practical Firewall Metrics...Was: INtrusion Detection, (continued)
- Practical Firewall Metrics...Was: INtrusion Detection Christopher Nicholls (Feb 20)
- Re: Practical Firewall Metrics Marcus J. Ranum (Feb 20)
- Re: Practical Firewall Metrics Michael Brennen (Feb 20)
- Re: Practical Firewall Metrics Marcus J. Ranum (Feb 20)
- Re: Practical Firewall Metrics Christopher Nicholls (Feb 24)
- Practical Firewall Metrics...Was: INtrusion Detection Christopher Nicholls (Feb 20)
- Re: Practical Firewall Metrics Bennett Todd (Feb 20)
- Re: Practical Firewall Metrics Leonard Miyata (Feb 20)
- Re: Practical Firewall Metrics...Was: INtrusion Detection Bennett Todd (Feb 20)
- Re: INtrusion Detection Adam Shostack (Feb 18)
- Re: INtrusion Detection Marcus J. Ranum (Feb 18)
- RE: INtrusion Detection Alfred Huger (Feb 19)
- Re: INtrusion Detection tqbf (Feb 19)
- Re: INtrusion Detection George M. Jones (Feb 20)
- Re: INtrusion Detection Alfred Huger (Feb 20)