Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Say it ain't so
From: Sandeep_Talwar () notes pw com
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 97 19:54:33 EDT
It all depends as to what is your security policy and how you have to implement it( THe security policy ). What services are to be allowed to pass throughthe firewall, what are the hosts you wish to hide from the Internet( or outside your secured zone) typically your protected LAN for which you have installed the firewall.Do you want NAT for your protected hosts. These are the issues to be considered. Does not necessarily mean that all IP addresses have to be changed. A typical firewall has rules to be configured as per your security policy of your organization.THe firewall would be the only entry and exit for your network with the outside or untrusted network. Again your network setup would be as per your security policy. This would typically include your mail set up as well and ofcorse this would have to be reconfigured with the Firewall. But again it all depends uopn what are your requirements.Hope this helps. Sandeep
Hi All, I've got a meeting with our Firewall Installers on the 29th. >Got pulled into as a result of 'centralizing' our computer/technology staff and creation of a helpdesk. The upshot is this. We have been apprised by one of the staff (Originally selected installation/Firewall) and was told that every device behind the firewall would have to 'be touched' for anything to work. It almost sounds like a complete rework of the network setup/standard. We were told that all IP addresses would have to be changed. Somehow I get the impression that this is the installers idea, and I'm not quite willing to by into it. I feel that it should be possible to 'plug-in' any properly configured firewall (with the exception of the proxies) and not have to reconfigure machines. Am I wrong? Jim Leo admin () everett pitt cc nc us
Current thread:
- Say it ain't so Jim Leo (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Erik Van Riper (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Neil Ratzlaff (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Colin Campbell (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Paul D. Robertson (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Rick Murphy (Sep 19)
- Re: Say it ain't so Paul D. Robertson (Sep 19)
- Re: Say it ain't so Carl Friedberg, carl () comets com (Sep 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Say it ain't so jim (Sep 18)
- RE: Say it ain't so Giesinger, Nick HE0 (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Sandeep_Talwar (Sep 18)
- RE: Say it ain't so Russ (Sep 19)
- Re: Say it Ain't So Jim Leo (Sep 19)