Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Gauntlet & NTLM
From: "Ge' Weijers" <ge () progressive-systems com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 12:49:42 -0400 (EDT)
Ah! That's an interesting situation. Does anyone actually *implement* the PPP RFCs for security? I know that there are all kinds of useful things in the RFC but I don't think, for example, that my W95 PPP stack supports encryption.
If you install PPTP on W95 or NT your PPP gets updated with the encryption capability. It's Microsofts own MPPE encryption, which depends on their brand of CHAP..... etc. They've extended the _compression_ control protocol to handle this :-( The current RFCs for PPP encryption are somewhat limited, you get DES and triple DES. That's about it. Ge'
Current thread:
- Gauntlet & NTLM Richard Trott (Oct 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Gauntlet & NTLM Linwood Ferguson (Oct 13)
- RE: Gauntlet & NTLM Craig Brozefsky (Oct 13)
- RE: Gauntlet & NTLM Ge' Weijers (Oct 13)
- RE: Gauntlet & NTLM Craig Brozefsky (Oct 13)
- RE: Gauntlet & NTLM Aleph One (Oct 14)
- RE: Gauntlet & NTLM Marcus J. Ranum (Oct 14)
- RE: Gauntlet & NTLM Ge' Weijers (Oct 14)
- RE: Gauntlet & NTLM Magossa'nyi A'rpa'd (Oct 15)
- PPTP viability (was RE: Gauntlet & NTLM) Philip Cox (Oct 15)
- Re: PPTP viability (was RE: Gauntlet & NTLM) Adam Shostack (Oct 15)
- Re: PPTP viability (was RE: Gauntlet & NTLM) Ge' Weijers (Oct 15)
- Re: PPTP viability (was RE: Gauntlet & NTLM) Craig Brozefsky (Oct 15)
- Re: PPTP viability (was RE: Gauntlet & NTLM) Jyri Kaljundi (Oct 17)
- Re: PPTP viability (was RE: Gauntlet & NTLM) Kent Crispin (Oct 21)
- RE: Gauntlet & NTLM Craig Brozefsky (Oct 13)
- RE: Gauntlet & NTLM Ge' Weijers (Oct 14)
- Re: Gauntlet & NTLM (PPTP weekness) Chris Boscolo (Oct 15)
- Re: Gauntlet & NTLM (PPTP weekness) Ge' Weijers (Oct 15)