Re: Replacing NetReg with ?

[Guy Almes <galmes () TAMU EDU>]

Dan,
  I agree.
  Otherwise, if we communicate to the vendors that v6 support is not 
important, the problem that Mark noted will persist.
        -- Guy

On 2/19/14, 10:24 AM, Dan Oachs wrote:
> I think anything bought today really should have IPv6 support.  If
> people like us don't require that, it will never happen.  If we were in
> the market it would have had to have supported IPv6 since 2010.
>
> --Dan Oachs
>
>
> On 02/19/2014 10:07 AM, Ryan Skelton wrote:
> > I would not worry too much about IPv6 right now. And by the time it is
> > a need Safe Connect will have that addressed.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Mark Boolootian <booloo () ucsc edu
> > <mailto:booloo () ucsc edu>> wrote:
> >
> >     > If I were you I would seriously look into Safe Connect with an
> >     IPAM system such as Infoblox. You would be very happy.
> >
> >     Safe Connect doesn't currently have support for IPv6.  Buying products
> >     that lack IPv6 support in 2014 seems like a bad idea.