Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives

Re: Not so Nice Net


From: Heath Barnhart <heath.barnhart () WASHBURN EDU>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:18:39 -0600

Same here, I year ago I was seeing torpig traffic from a few 91.x.x.x networks after getting numerous alerts from REN-ISAC. We tracked down the hosts and fixed the problems, haven't seen issues in a while. I think I might check again.



On 2/8/2012 10:18 AM, Jeff Moore wrote:
Hi all - Got a weird one here... Has anyone else noticed that almost all traffic from 91.x.x.x is of a "not so good" nature? We created a custom snort sig a while back to track the 91.x.x.x range because we saw that a majority of TORPIGs control servers were in that range and our institution rarely if ever gets traffic from that net. What we found interesting was that over the last year or more we have found that every single hit on that signature traced back to be "Not so Nice" hosts. for example: http://www.mcafee.com/threat-intelligence/ip/default.aspx?ip=91.43.140.23 (one from this morning. just mail rep on this one). We have also traced each of these down on our side and have found that the only traffic(initiated from our net) that was not virus/malware related was traffic from "Panda Download Manager" Which we also didn't want and is a shady-ish MP3 download engine. It astounds me that day in day out if we see traffic from this net it is always "Not so Nice"!

I was just curious if you all have been seeing this as well and if not can ya take a peek to see if it rings true with your systems as well?

Maybe I have just gotten lucky. Just a strange little oddity that I was curious if you all have seen.

Thanks All!

--
Jeff Moore
Chemeketa Community College
Desk(503) 877-4707 <https://www.google.com/voice?pli=1#phones>
Cell (503) 9 <https://www.google.com/voice?pli=1#phones>10-0756
Jeff.Moore () chemeketa edu <mailto:Jeff.Moore () chemeketa edu>



--
*Heath Barnhart, CCNA*
Network Administrator
Information Systems Services
Washburn University
Topeka, KS

Current thread: