Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives

Re: Not so Nice Net


From: Martin Manjak <mmanjak () ALBANY EDU>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 11:48:19 -0500

Jeff,

Just want to clarify: you are referring to 91.0.0.0/8?

That's an awful lot of addresses, and AS's.

All not nice?
Marty


On 2/8/2012 11:18 AM, Jeff Moore wrote:
Hi all - Got a weird one here... Has anyone else noticed that almost all
traffic from 91.x.x.x is of a "not so good" nature? We created a custom
snort sig a while back to track the 91.x.x.x range because we saw that a
majority of TORPIGs control servers were in that range and our institution
rarely if ever gets traffic from that net.
What we found interesting was that over the last year or more we have found
that every single hit on that signature traced back to be "Not so Nice"
hosts. for example:
http://www.mcafee.com/threat-intelligence/ip/default.aspx?ip=91.43.140.23
(one from this morning. just mail rep on this one). We have also traced
each of these down on our side and have found that the only
traffic(initiated from our net) that was not virus/malware related was
traffic from "Panda Download Manager" Which we also didn't want and is a
shady-ish MP3 download engine. It astounds me that day in day out if we see
traffic from this net it is always "Not so Nice"!

I was just curious if you all have been seeing this as well and if not can
ya take a peek to see if it rings true with your systems as well?

Maybe I have just gotten lucky. Just a strange little oddity that I was
curious if you all have seen.

Thanks All!



-- 

Martin Manjak
CISSP, GIAC GSEC-G
Information Security Officer
University at Albany
MSC 209 518/437-3813

The University at Albany will never ask you to reveal your password.
Please ignore all such requests.


Current thread: