Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto
From: John Ladwig <John.Ladwig () CSU MNSCU EDU>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:30:35 -0600
I ask that question a lot. The answers indicate I'm still going to be in for trouble in a few years. This is like Y2K all over again, without a generally-recognized deadline. -jml
Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks () VT EDU> 2011-02-25 15:02 >>>
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:28:23 EST, Tim Nance said:
Three years ago we brought a Palo Alto device into our network to test it out. It wasn't quite ready for primetime. Misidentified traffic. Lacked a bit on the UI. A year ago we brought them back in, and I believe they are now fully baked.
Fully baked? How is its IPv6 support? Anybody who's not asking that question is in for trouble in the next few years...
Current thread:
- Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Consolvo, Corbett D (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Nathaniel Hall (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Kevin Wilcox (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Roderick Cook (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Basgen, Brian (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Tim Nance (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Kellogg, Brian D. (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Valdis Kletnieks (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto John Ladwig (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Valdis Kletnieks (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto John Ladwig (Feb 25)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Nathaniel Hall (Feb 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Joe Guenther (Mar 03)
- Re: Fortinet vs. Palo Alto Will Froning (Mar 06)