Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: significant incoming SSH volume
From: Michael Horne <Michael.Horne () OLIN EDU>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:23:44 -0400
All, We have a single SSH gateway for all inbound ssh traffic to the college. Single point of access and control for all inbound service. We also have deployed sshdfilter on the server as well and has worked great for us to date. Brute force attacks get routed to /dev/null after x amount of failed attempts configurable to your liking. A google search will bring up the source. It is a bit dated and requires updating when newer version of SSH are deployed but it mitigates a ton of headaches. Michael Horne Network Engineer Franklin W Olin College of Engineering Olin Way Needham MA 02492 Phone 1-781-292-2438 From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Justin Sipher Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 4:07 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: [SECURITY] significant incoming SSH volume Hello all. We have seen a drastic uptick in recent days for inbound SSH connections to many of our servers. These connection are attempting to connect to our servers as ROOT and are coming from IP addressed appearing to be mostly overseas. They number in the thousands of connections. While we are confident in the strength of our passwords, as you know with enough effort....... My questions to this group are: * Is anyone else seeing this? * Are you doing anything to address this? We are contemplating blocking SSH inbound on our firewall and requiring any external SSH connection to first connect to our VPN. In some ways it seems excessive and maybe even unsustainable. On the other hand, protecting our servers is important as you well know. Any advice, feedback, or suggestion of best practice is welcome. Best & thanks! ...Justin ________________________ Justin Sipher Chief Technology Officer Skidmore College Saratoga Springs, NY jsipher () skidmore edu<mailto:jsipher () skidmore edu> 518-580-5909
Current thread:
- significant incoming SSH volume Justin Sipher (Mar 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: significant incoming SSH volume Joe Vieira (Mar 16)
- Re: significant incoming SSH volume Edgmand, Craig (Mar 16)
- Re: significant incoming SSH volume Michael Horne (Mar 16)
- Re: significant incoming SSH volume Joel Rosenblatt (Mar 16)
- Re: significant incoming SSH volume John Kristoff (Mar 16)
- Re: significant incoming SSH volume Mike Iglesias (Mar 16)
- Re: significant incoming SSH volume Michael J. Wheeler (Mar 16)
- Re: significant incoming SSH volume Russell Fulton (Mar 17)
- Re: significant incoming SSH volume Dexter Caldwell (Mar 17)
- Re: significant incoming SSH volume Miller, Don C. (Mar 18)
- Re: significant incoming SSH volume Michael J. Wheeler (Mar 18)
- Re: significant incoming SSH volume Scott Beardsley (Mar 19)