Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Listserv's
From: Neil Gaede <neil () STTHOM EDU>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:06:35 -0600
People around here have the bad habit of referring to the lists themselves as "listserves"; in conversations with those folks I always make it a point to refer to them as "mailing lists". I've been monkeying with Sympa off and on for the last year or two. Sympa 6 does improve many things, but even with the improvements to the web interface it's still a little obtuse. Its LDAP integration and dynamic list capabilities are two major reasons why I started looking at it in the first place, and the fact that it's free didn't hurt either. Neil Gaede Systems Administrator University of St. Thomas - Houston On Feb 10, 2010, at 4:15 PM, Jeff Giacobbe wrote:
We too use Sympa (having just converted thousands of lists from an ancient version of Lyris). Latest Sympa 6.x has a much improved web gui than the 5.x branch, though we haven't upgraded to 6.x yet. Sympa is FOSS and as mentioned integrates well with LDAP, including the ability to build mailing lists dynamically "on the fly" based on LDAP search criteria (i.e. send email to every user who's LDAP department attribute = "English" at the time the message is being distributed) Regards, Jeff Giacobbe Assistant Vice President Enterprise Technology Montclair State University On 2/10/10 4:11 PM, Joe Vieira wrote:We use Sympa, have somewhere in the high thousands (7,000+) of lists. Sympa also integrates with openLDAP really nice. Joe Vieira Manager, Systems Administration Clark University Valdis Kletnieks wrote:On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:46:56 CST, "Julian Y. Koh" said:To be pedantic, "listserv" refers itself to a specific software package. :) But perhaps it's been Kleenexed or Xeroxed. :)I have the LSoft 20th anniversary shirt that says 'There is only one LISTSERV'. Eric Thomas told me they paid for the shirts out of their "trademark protection" budget, not their "advertising" budget - the term hasn't gone generic yet. The scary part is I've been working with it long enough to know *why* it was called the 'Revised' Listserv 2 decades plus ago. ;) Yes, we run the LSoft software. 8,441 lists defined at the moment.
Current thread:
- Re: Listserv's, (continued)
- Re: Listserv's Greg Schaffer (Feb 10)
- Re: Listserv's Valdis Kletnieks (Feb 10)
- Re: Listserv's Joe Vieira (Feb 10)
- Re: Listserv's Adam Nave (Feb 10)
- Re: Listserv's Joe Vieira (Feb 10)
- Re: Listserv's Kenneth Arnold (Feb 10)
- Re: Listserv's Kieper, David (Feb 10)
- Re: Listserv's Jeff Giacobbe (Feb 10)
- Re: Listserv's Clark, Sean (Feb 10)
- Re: Listserv's Jeff Kell (Feb 10)
- Re: Listserv's Neil Gaede (Feb 11)