Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Student workers & shared drive restrictions
From: "Spransy, Derek" <DSPRANS () EMORY EDU>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:50:30 -0400
Agreed, and indeed, I would sometimes trust students to make better security decisions than staff :-) However, they are not permanent employees of the University and in practice often receive little training from the departments that hire them. The question of access really belongs more in the hands of the data custodians than it does with the security staff. In our case the department makes the access decisions and students don't usually get access to particularly sensitive information (mostly because the data that they would have access to includes academic and disciplinary information about other students), and those job responsibilities rest mostly with the staff. In the case in question, if the risk of students abusing their access is considered to be high, then it may be best to put those responsibilities elsewhere. ________________________________________ From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Bob Kalal [kalal.1 () OSU EDU] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 7:26 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Student workers & shared drive restrictions Folks seem to forget that "students" are adult citizens. If they hadn't come to college many would be handling patient files in your doctor's office, training for a job with your local police, maintaining your kids school, fielding help desk questions at your credit institution, or dealing with other "sensitive' tasks. They deserve adequate training and can handle responsibilities. Bob Kalal On Jun 1, 2009, at 5:43 PM, Spransy, Derek wrote:
... It's also a best practice to avoid giving students access to data that with a high level of sensitivity as well. Hope that helps! If you'd like more details on our set up I'd be happy to share offline.
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original message (including attachments).
Current thread:
- Student workers & shared drive restrictions Bazeley, Joseph E. (Jun 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Student workers & shared drive restrictions Brian Desmond (Jun 01)
- Re: Student workers & shared drive restrictions Brad Judy (Jun 01)
- Re: Student workers & shared drive restrictions Valdis Kletnieks (Jun 01)
- Re: Student workers & shared drive restrictions Bazeley, Joseph E. (Jun 01)
- Re: Student workers & shared drive restrictions Valdis Kletnieks (Jun 01)
- Re: Student workers & shared drive restrictions Spransy, Derek (Jun 01)
- Re: Student workers & shared drive restrictions Dexter Caldwell (Jun 01)
- Re: Student workers & shared drive restrictions Bob Kalal (Jun 01)
- Re: Student workers & shared drive restrictions Spransy, Derek (Jun 01)
- Re: Student workers & shared drive restrictions Valdis Kletnieks (Jun 01)
- Re: Student workers & shared drive restrictions Charles Buchholtz (Jun 01)
- Re: Student workers & shared drive restrictions Witmer, Robert (Jun 01)