Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved
From: Jason Testart <jatestart () UWATERLOO CA>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:33:27 -0400
Brian Desmond wrote:
The model of having the empty root is a Windows 2000 era thing that was largely from misguided assumptions.
Could you please elaborate on what these misguided assumptions might be? jt -- Jason A. Testart, BMath | Voice: +1-519-888-4567 x38393 Manager, IT Security | Fax: +1-519-884-4398 Information Systems and Technology | http://ist.uwaterloo.ca/security University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 CANADA
Current thread:
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved, (continued)
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved Tupker, Mike (Mar 13)
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved F.M. Taylor (Mar 13)
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved John Kaftan (Mar 13)
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved Patrick P Murphy (Mar 13)
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved Miller, Don C. (Mar 13)
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved Miller, Don C. (Mar 13)
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved Chris Green (Mar 13)
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved Anand S Malwade (Mar 13)
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved Brian Desmond (Mar 13)
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved Brian Desmond (Mar 13)
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved Jason Testart (Mar 13)
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved Brian Desmond (Mar 13)
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved Marmina Abdel Malek (Mar 13)
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved Brian Desmond (Mar 13)
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved Ryan S. Johnston (Mar 16)
- Re: Windows Domain Controllers: Risks involved David Gillett (Mar 17)