Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: anti-spam software
From: Michael Young <Michael.Young () RIT EDU>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:36:59 -0400
Almost three years ago now, we evaluated several anti-spam products for our environment. We ended up selecting Symantec Mail Security (formerly Brightmail) and have been very happy with it. We initially looked at the features of many products to narrow the field down. We then tried out Brightmail, MailFronter, IronMail, PureMessage, and PreciseMail. Brightmail won hands down. Low user maintenance, false positive rate, directory integration and language support were key requirements. Users have the ability to manage their own white/black lists, as well as the languages they will accept. With the directory integration, we also have the ability to provide customized policies to individual colleges or departments on campus that run their own mail server. We have ~17,500 users. In the past week, 95.5% threats of 12,527,861 connections/messages were removed. Our users typically report less than 100 messages per day that have gotten past it, and there are less than 50 false positives per day. Less than 2,000 of our users see messages in their quarantine, and very few feel the need to maintain a white/black list at all. We have three standalone appliances, which we're considering moving to the vmWare ESX virtual version when the hardware comes end of life. The only downside is the relative cost, but it is extremely effective and very low maintenance. Michael Young RIT -----Original Message----- From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Maria Iano Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 3:25 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: [SECURITY] anti-spam software -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am hoping to pick your brains about commercial anti-spam solutions. The Math Department has roughly 1000 user accounts and currently uses SpamAssassin, as well as many of the spam filtering options in postfix such as header and body checks and DNS blacklists. Our users mark messages as spam and we feed them to the Bayesian database for SpamAssassin. Nonetheless, a lot of spam still gets through. So we are looking into commercial anti-spam software. Has anyone else gone the route of purchasing a commercial solution? If so, how did it work out for you? Has anyone else compiled a review of the different choices and how they compare? If so, I would love to see it. If you know of any commercial anti-spam providers that offer deep education discounts that would be good to know also. Thanks for any help you can give. Maria Iano - -- iano () math umd edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFIjh0oc8AgwQtz1wIRAtcvAKDv+QN8I1Plm+pZcX9zU+vV735rhgCgjxoq uctVUHIr8rTQigx6eviOopk= =KCHm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- anti-spam software Maria Iano (Jul 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: anti-spam software Basgen, Brian (Jul 28)
- Re: anti-spam software David Kovarik (Jul 28)
- Re: anti-spam software Bob Bayn (Jul 28)
- Re: anti-spam software David Lundy (Jul 28)
- Re: anti-spam software Paul Russell (Jul 28)
- Re: anti-spam software Jeffrey Ramsay (Jul 28)
- Re: anti-spam software Cody, James (Jul 29)
- Re: anti-spam software Jason C. Belford (Jul 29)
- Re: anti-spam software Ken Connelly (Jul 29)
- Re: anti-spam software Michael Young (Jul 29)
- Re: anti-spam software Jesse Thompson (Jul 29)
- Re: anti-spam software David Boyer (Jul 29)
- Re: anti-spam software Maria Iano (Jul 29)