Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Evaluating Rapid7's Nexpose
From: Michael Bayne <baynema () JMU EDU>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:27:59 -0400
We're currently evaluating Rapid7's Nexpose vulnerability scanner. They claim to have a large install base in education, so I thought I'd see if any of you were using it and what your experience with it have been. I'm particularly interested in your estimates of false positives/false negatives, how you handle false positives in reporting, scalability, experiences with Rapid7's technical support, how well its database and web services scans work. The marketing guy was pushing the fact that all the vulnerability checks are stored in text files and custom vulnerability checks can be written. The scripting language for the checks seems to be proprietary, however, which makes writing custom checks a tad bit hard without documentation. Has anyone tried to write custom checks? Have you had custom checks written for you by Rapid7? Have you been able to get documentation about scripting from Rapid7? Any other thoughts you might want to share would be appreciated. Thanks. -- Mike Bayne Security Engineer baynema () jmu edu 1.540.568.1684
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- Evaluating Rapid7's Nexpose Michael Bayne (Apr 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Evaluating Rapid7's Nexpose Logan, Kimberly (loganks) (Apr 11)
- Re: Evaluating Rapid7's Nexpose Conor McGrath (Apr 11)
- Re: Evaluating Rapid7's Nexpose Stelfox, Samuel G @ VTC (Apr 11)
- Re: Evaluating Rapid7's Nexpose Jason Carr (Apr 11)
- Re: Evaluating Rapid7's Nexpose Ferris, Joe (Apr 12)
- Re: Evaluating Rapid7's Nexpose Steve Brukbacher (Apr 12)