Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives

Has anyone looked at digital archiving?


From: James H Moore <jhmfa () RIT EDU>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:42:50 -0400

A very talented systems administrator with very good security knowledge,
named Chris asked me a question about digital archiving, and after a
conversation, we had more questions than answers.

 

The situation:

Different groups on campus are looking to the library to archive campus
publications (among other things).  Since these are in digital format
usually, they want to submit them electronically.  Disk is cheap.  No
problem ... well some of them are kind of large.  

 

Chris asks them how long are they going to be stored and when they might
be used when retrieved.  The answer "40 years" comes from somewhere.
And they just figure that someone might want to do "40 years ago"
column, or some other historical research, etc.  Chris starts to wonder
about digital signatures to verify integrity.  This is where we start to
ask questions.  We realize that we are thinking about getting the C I A
right for the next few days or months, not 40 years.  Integrity and
availability have a much different meaning 40 years out.  Digital
signatures will tell if the image has been tampered with, but what would
be nice is something with ECC built-in so that the original state could
be recovered if corrupted.

 

Then we talk about media.  The temptation is to put it on CDRs or
writable DVDs and store them well.  I ask about 8 inch floppies.  That
technology isn't 40 years old, but I don't have anything to read them
with.  Will the same happen to CDs and DVDs in 40 years?  People used to
go through mag tape refreshes every few years. But as you sum up the
archiving disks that you might burn, year upon year, after a number of
years, just converting and retiring media could become a fulltime job.

 

Then we realize that we are talking about things like Word 2003 and
Adobe 7.  What will Word 2046 look like?  Will it read Word 2003
documents?  Will Internet Explorer 23 still be patched with almost every
Microsoft patch cycle?  Oops, got off of the subject.  You get the
picture.  Word 2003 seems to go back to Word 95.  But even then you get
messages like "Formatting may be lost" when it wants to convert on
opening.  And it doesn't say anything about Word 6, the predecessor to
Word 95.  So where does integrity and availability go in archiving for
40 years?

 

Has anyone looked at this type of issue from a practical standpoint?
Any solutions?

- - - -
Jim Moore, CISSP, IAM
Information Security Officer
Rochester Institute of Technology
13 Lomb Memorial Drive
Rochester, NY 14623-5603
(585) 475-5406 (office)
(585) 475-4122 (lab)
(585) 475-7950 (fax)

"We will have a chance when we are as efficient at communicating
information security best practices, as hackers and criminals are at
sharing attack information"  - Peter Presidio




 


Current thread: