Dailydave mailing list archives
Caffeine is bad for you, calc is worse.
From: Dave Aitel <dave () immunityinc com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 10:30:05 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I read through a bunch of papers from the Workshop on the Economics of Information Security this morning. (I'm cutting down on the caffeine and substituting academia.) http://weis2006.econinfosec.org/prog.html <http://weis2006.econinfosec.org/prog.html> The best: http://weis2006.econinfosec.org/docs/38.pdf In this paper they show how to avoid the RIAA catching you (via the WASTE network protocol, essentially) which also applies to how bin Laden's wee little group is set up. Assuming I read it correctly at 5am. The worst: http://weis2006.econinfosec.org/docs/54.pdf "Consider the end user with type (naiveté), n. If she buys the software, her expected net benefit, given the hacking level X, would be: <nasty equation here> <small graph here>" "Lemma 1. There exists a non-trivial equilibrium between end-users and hacker, k*, n(k*) and f(n(k*)|k*)" The funniest: http://weis2006.econinfosec.org/docs/17.pdf Herein, iDefense mentions Immunity and Gleg and Argeniss! We're famous! Here's my submission to the Workshop on the Economics of Information Security : (:>) Abstract. Some ideas clearly not based in fact. Introduction Some problem statements, vaguely formed. Prior Literature Lots of references, most of which have nothing to do with the topic, but which have similar titles. Basic Setting A formulated problem with nothing to do with reality. As weird as zero-friction surfaces, except also as vague as a religious text. Section where I make up some terminology Made up terminology I hope will catch on. Also some equations where I take the sum of apples and differentiate that to the base of oranges and then maximize that with respect to pears. Section with some words where I also have a graph. A graph or two (small) and then a table with some numbers (also small). Conclusion Attempt to avoid any notice that behavior predicted has no basis in reality. References I'll try to reference at least 3 web pages here which may or may not exist in six month's time. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEbdZstehAhL0gheoRAqS5AJ9PM6mDUy/7BsdlnRk8v2FJmLu3fQCeJI8B eRv3n7r1b3fqc8u5E8QA/Uk= =UuTv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Caffeine is bad for you, calc is worse. Dave Aitel (May 19)
- Re: Caffeine is bad for you, calc is worse. dan (May 19)
- Re: Caffeine is bad for you, calc is worse. Dave Aitel (May 19)
- Re: Caffeine is bad for you, calc is worse. Schuyler Stultz (May 19)
- Re: Caffeine is bad for you, calc is worse. Anton Chuvakin (May 19)
- Re: Caffeine is bad for you, calc is worse. listlurker (May 21)
- Re: Caffeine is bad for you, calc is worse. dan (May 19)