Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question.

From: Doug.Hughes () Eng Auburn EDU (Doug Hughes)
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 1994 12:49:07 -0600


If I recall correctly, (I could be wrong), was the original discussion
about sudo? If so, why not statically link it? (I'm not discounting
the importance of the LD_* problem).

Current thread:

Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. hoodr () hoodr slip netcom com (Dec 02)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Rens Troost (Dec 03)
  - Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Pat Myrto (Dec 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. jim () Tadpole COM (Dec 02)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Ken Descoteaux (Dec 05)
  - Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Casper Dik (Dec 06)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Doug Hughes (Dec 05)
  - Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Bonfield James (Dec 06)
    - Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Todd C. Miller (Dec 06)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. hoodr () hoodr slip netcom com (Dec 05)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. James R. Ault (Dec 06)
  - Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Pat Myrto (Dec 07)
  - AOL Provided Programs Michael S. Hines (Dec 07)