Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: server security
From: Dave Kleiman <dave () davekleiman com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:51:54 -0500
Tracy, You would have to admit little layers of security, such as running non-standard ports, can protect you as in the Slammer worm. I am not saying that is the best or recommended solution to a problem, but it can work. Respectfully, Dave Kleiman - http://www.ComputerForensicsLLC.com - http://www.DaveKleiman.com 4371 Northlake Blvd #314 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 561.310.8801 -----Original Message----- From: Tracy Reed [mailto:treed () ultraviolet org] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 18:31 To: Tracy Reed Cc: Dave Kleiman; security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Re: server security On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 02:54:22PM PDT, Tracy Reed spake thusly:
Many "little layers of security" just aren't worth it.
Clarification: Some "little layers of security" just aren't worth it. Multiple layers of security certainly are. -- Tracy Reed
Current thread:
- Re: server security, (continued)
- Re: server security Jerome Athias (Jun 21)
- Re: server security Littlefield, Tyler (Jun 21)
- Re: server security Killian Faughnan (Jun 21)
- Re: server security Rory Browne (Jun 22)
- Re: server security Littlefield, Tyler (Jun 22)
- RE: server security Ron McKown (Jun 22)
- RE: server security Ward, Jon (Jun 22)
- RE: server security Dave Kleiman (Jun 22)
- Re: server security Tracy Reed (Jun 22)
- Re: server security Tracy Reed (Jun 22)
- RE: server security Dave Kleiman (Jun 22)
- Re: server security Rob (Jun 22)
- Re: server security Ansgar Wiechers (Jun 25)
- RE: server security Dave Kleiman (Jun 22)
- RE: server security Tommy Thomas (Jun 26)
- Re: server security Tracy Reed (Jun 22)
- RE: RE: server security Primrose,Jacqueline (HHSC) (Jun 28)