Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Conflict of interests
From: "James Flaherty" <jflaherty () itsfac com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 08:57:47 -0400
I would say that your requests, with reasonable explanation, should be granted. You may need a brief and have your boss back you up with some muscle, but if your requests are legit, there's no reason anyone should have a problem with granting you specific access. If your company is on the government/military side I could definitely see your request getting denied, but otherwise you should be good to go. -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of s0h0us () yahoo com Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 2:17 PM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Conflict of interests As a security guy, not part of the IT department, I require a level of access in order to perform my job. Certain types of tools require privileged access in order to work. Like having domain admin access and/or similar privileged access for unix and linux systems. Is it reasonable to request this type of access without causing any type of conflict of interest that internal auditors might question? I guess audit trails would come in handy here. Thanks for the feedback. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: InfoSec Institute Learn all of the latest penetration testing techniques in InfoSec Institute's Ethical Hacking class. Totally hands-on course with evening Capture The Flag (CTF) exercises, Certified Ethical Hacker and Certified Penetration Tester exams, taught by an expert with years of real pen testing experience. http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Important Notice: This email message and any attachments may contain information and/or trade secrets that are private, and are meant to be delivered solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use, forward or disclose the contents of this communication to others. Interception of e-mail is a crime under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2522 and 2701-2709. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify us by return email or by telephone at [703-221-0200 Ext 51119] and promptly delete this message. Thank You. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: InfoSec Institute Learn all of the latest penetration testing techniques in InfoSec Institute's Ethical Hacking class. Totally hands-on course with evening Capture The Flag (CTF) exercises, Certified Ethical Hacker and Certified Penetration Tester exams, taught by an expert with years of real pen testing experience. http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Conflict of interests s0h0us (May 04)
- RE: Conflict of interests Ian Bradshaw (May 05)
- RE: Conflict of interests Nick Vaernhoej (May 05)
- Re: Conflict of interests Sebastien MAHIEUX (May 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Conflict of interests s0h0us (May 05)
- RE: Conflict of interests James Flaherty (May 05)
- Re: Conflict of interests s0h0us (May 05)
- RE: Conflict of interests James Flaherty (May 05)
- Re: Conflict of interests David Schekaiban (May 05)
- Re: Conflict of interests Richard Thomas (May 05)
- Re: Conflict of interests s0h0us (May 05)
- Re: Conflict of interests Richard Thomas (May 05)
- Re: Conflict of interests Aarón Mizrachi (May 06)
- RE: Conflict of interests Dave Kleiman (May 06)
- Re: Conflict of interests s0h0us (May 05)
- Re: Conflict of interests Adam Pal (May 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Conflict of interests aaa . bbb (May 05)
- Re: Re: Conflict of interests raketomet (May 11)