Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Port-Knocking vulnerabilities?
From: "Craig Wright" <Craig.Wright () bdo com au>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:13:27 +1100
Jay, You state I have not looked at this. I guess you have not looked at the threads from a year ago, and from before that and etc. This topic raises its ugly head from time to time when someone gets the idea that it is the great new thing. If there alread is a password or similar, portknocking adds no value. The economic cost to the user is less then the gain. That is a loss. All improveemtns are bound on a gain/loss function. Limited resources equal limited places to put our effort and money. You posted this not for the benifit of those that are truly trying to learn security basics, but yourself. As I stated, change the TCP flag options in all packets and you have gained as much (maybe more) then portknocking. It is a script kiddy toy designed to hide listening trojans. It is not a security tool and you are not helpiong those who do not know a lot about security by adding FUD to their knowledge. Regards, Dr Craig Wright (GSE-Compliance) Craig Wright Manager of Information Systems Direct : +61 2 9286 5497 Craig.Wright () bdo com au +61 417 683 914 BDO Kendalls (NSW) Level 19, 2 Market Street Sydney NSW 2000 GPO BOX 2551 Sydney NSW 2001 Fax +61 2 9993 9497 www.bdo.com.au Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation in respect of matters arising within those States and Territories of Australia where such legislation exists. The information in this email and any attachments is confidential. If you are not the named addressee you must not read, print, copy, distribute, or use in any way this transmission or any information it contains. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return email, destroy all copies and delete it from your system. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and not necessarily endorsed by BDO Kendalls. You may not rely on this message as advice unless subsequently confirmed by fax or letter signed by a Partner or Director of BDO Kendalls. It is your responsibility to scan this communication and any files attached for computer viruses and other defects. BDO Kendalls does not accept liability for any loss or damage however caused which may result from this communication or any files attached. A full version of the BDO Kendalls disclaimer, and our Privacy statement, can be found on the BDO Kendalls website at http://www.bdo.com.au or by emailing administrator () bdo com au. BDO Kendalls is a national association of separate partnerships and entities. ________________________________________ From: listbounce () securityfocus com [listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Jay [jay.tomas () infosecguru com] Sent: Tuesday, 1 January 2008 4:49 AM To: bugtraq () planetcobalt net; security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Re: Port-Knocking vulnerabilities? Is portknocking a weaker security mechanism. Does that discount it completely. Telnet and ftp our clear text. Just because something can be defeated doesn't mean it loses 'all' its classification A door is meant to provide some defense to the outside of your house. I can certainly bash it in with a sledge hammer. It still serves its purpose as a layer of the defense. Again we are talking about security basics here. You can say it isn't viable or is inherently weak. But the way it is implemented its used for authentication. Plain and simple. ----- Original Message ----- From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers [mailto:bugtraq () planetcobalt net] To: security-basics () securityfocus com Sent: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 14:28:53 +0100 Subject: Re: Port-Knocking vulnerabilities? On 2007-12-28 Jay wrote:
Portknocking is a security mechanism as it is a type of authentication. "Something you know" in this case the sequence of ports to knock before a unstarted service or daemon begins listening for connections.
Since everything is transmitted in the clear port-knocking is as much of a security mechanism as cleartext passwords. Technically: maybe (depending on your definition). Realistically: no. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- "The Mac OS X kernel should never panic because, when it does, it seriously inconveniences the user." --http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2004/tn2118.html
Current thread:
- Re: Port-Knocking vulnerabilities?, (continued)
- Re: Port-Knocking vulnerabilities? Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Dec 31)
- Re: Port-Knocking vulnerabilities? Robert Inder (Dec 31)
- Re: Port-Knocking vulnerabilities? Goldstein101 (Dec 31)
- RE: Port-Knocking vulnerabilities? Craig Wright (Dec 31)
- Re: Port-Knocking vulnerabilities? Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Dec 31)
- RE: Port-Knocking vulnerabilities? Craig Wright (Dec 31)
- Re: Port-Knocking vulnerabilities? Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Dec 31)
- Re: Port-Knocking vulnerabilities? Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Dec 31)
- Re: Port-Knocking vulnerabilities? Brent Huston (Dec 31)
- RE: Port-Knocking vulnerabilities? Craig Wright (Dec 31)