Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: About War Driving ..
From: "Francois Yang" <francois.y () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:35:55 -0600
I actually disagree with this analogy. layered defense in this scenario would be; add a security guard to the front door, add bars to the windows and add a watch dog inside the house. So the entry points are the same they didn't move, you just added some extra security to these entry points. So now if someone wanted to get in the house, they would have to get past the security guard before reaching the door, or get past the bars on the windows before getting to the windows, and once they get past those, hopefully the guard dog would catch him/her. On 12/9/06, Eric Furman <ericfurman () fastmail net> wrote:
On 8 Dec 2006 14:28:21 -0000, krymson () gmail com said: > Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers and > FatalSaint: > > Just want to say I'd watched this thread and I wanted to quickly point > out something I felt was kind of a poignant thing in our field. > > You both have good points and, in my mind, you both have rather correct > approaches. One of you believes that a layered defense with multiple > hurdles will slow down attackers and stop a lot of non-savvy attackers, > and the other prefers to shoot for the highly-skilled attacker and focus > his efforts. > > I believe both approaches are just fine, and just depends on the people, > business/network, and needs. I disagree. ;-) I do agree with layered defenses, if they're real. Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers objects to FatalSaint's security measures because they amount to the following analogy; I want to keep burglars out of my house. Everyone knows that the entrance to houses is in the front and all doors are painted red. To increase my security I am going to move the entrance to the side and I am going to paint my door blue. Yes, to the casual person, walking by, this will work, but not to any determined attacker. All I have really done is make thing more inconvenient for me, the resident. Do not push this analogy to far, but it is essentially correct. IMHO. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is sponsored by: ByteCrusher Detect Malicious Web Content and Exploits in Real-Time. Anti-Virus engines can't detect unknown or new threats. LinkScanner can. Web surfing just became a whole lot safer. http://www.explabs.com/staging/promotions/xern_lspro.asp?loc=sfmaildetect ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is sponsored by: ByteCrusher Detect Malicious Web Content and Exploits in Real-Time. Anti-Virus engines can't detect unknown or new threats. LinkScanner can. Web surfing just became a whole lot safer. http://www.explabs.com/staging/promotions/xern_lspro.asp?loc=sfmaildetect ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: About War Driving .., (continued)
- RE: About War Driving .. David Gillett (Dec 06)
- Re: About War Driving .. Paul daSilva (Dec 04)
- Re: Re: About War Driving .. giles (Dec 04)
- RE: About War Driving .. Dan Bogda (Dec 04)
- Re: Re: About War Driving .. anone (Dec 04)
- RE: Re[2]: About War Driving .. Paul Stone (Dec 07)
- RE: Re[2]: About War Driving .. David Gillett (Dec 08)
- RE: Re[2]: About War Driving .. Murda Mcloud (Dec 08)
- Re: About War Driving .. krymson (Dec 08)
- Re: About War Driving .. Eric Furman (Dec 12)
- Re: About War Driving .. Francois Yang (Dec 12)
- RE: About War Driving .. David Gillett (Dec 12)
- Blue Lane PatchPoint Mark Brunner (Dec 13)
- Re: About War Driving .. Layne FInk (Dec 13)
- Re: About War Driving .. Eric Furman (Dec 12)
- Re: About War Driving .. Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Dec 14)