Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: VPN overkill?
From: "Thomas F. Szabo" <tszabo () diamondtech net>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:44:39 -0500
I've got a few pix firewalls deployed at remote sites connecting back to a concentrator just like you describe and it works fine. I just wouldn't go below a PIX 506 at the remote site. Good luck with your deployment. Tom Szabo -----Original Message----- From: Ted A [mailto:arcturous () hotmail com] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 9:32 PM To: Thomas F. Szabo; security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: RE: VPN overkill? You're right about the details. How incredibly stupid of me. The setup is pretty basic. It's going to be used for after hours backup uploads, and day time file access. Nothing too intensive. Roughly 10 people at the remote site, not more than 2 or 3 accessing resources on the central server at a given time. Yes there will be servers on both ends. There will not be any remote application usage. It's the base of the basics.
From the initial planning it looks like the baseline bandwidth will be a
T1. The basic setup is: Remote Lan Server Border Router PIX {internet} Concentrator Router Server Central Lan etc..... Ted
Current thread:
- VPN overkill? Ted A (Nov 16)
- RE: VPN overkill? Tom Milliner (Nov 17)
- RE: VPN overkill? David Gillett (Nov 17)
- RE: VPN overkill? Ted A (Nov 18)
- RE: VPN overkill? Keith Bucknall (Nov 17)
- Re: VPN overkill? Jamie Schmidt (Nov 17)
- Re: VPN overkill? Gautam R. Singh (Nov 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: VPN overkill? Thomas F. Szabo (Nov 17)
- RE: VPN overkill? Jim McBurnett (Nov 17)
- RE: VPN overkill? Ted A (Nov 17)
- RE: VPN overkill? Thomas F. Szabo (Nov 17)
- RE: VPN overkill? Gary Freeman (Nov 17)
- RE: VPN overkill? d'Ambly, Jeff (Nov 17)
- RE: VPN overkill? Jeff Gercken (Nov 17)
- RE: VPN overkill? Gary Freeman (Nov 17)
- RE: VPN overkill? Justin Acquaro (Nov 17)