Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned]
From: ~Kevin Davis³ <computerguy () cfl rr com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:10:13 -0500
You forgot that many in this thread have argued that if you have an open port, you are, in fact, announcing to the world that they (the public) indeed can use the service of that underlying port. That was mainly what I was objecting to. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shawn Jackson" <sjackson () horizonusa com> To: "~Kevin Davis³" <computerguy () cfl rr com>; <security-basics () securityfocus com> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 1:03 PM Subject: RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned]
By using your own logic, if one were to unknowingly fall victim to a Trojan and a hacker port scanned that box and found the Trojan holding a port
open,
it is perfectly legitimate and legal for that hacker to make use of that Trojan and take control of the box.
We forgot that portscans don't use the service of the underlying port, they only check to see if the port itself is open. Shawn Jackson Systems Administrator Horizon USA 1190 Trademark Dr #107 Reno NV 89521 www.horizonusa.com Email: sjackson () horizonusa com Phone: (775) 858-2338 (800) 325-1199 x338 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization. Visit us at: http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned], (continued)
- RE: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] James . Fields (Mar 12)
- RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] Mitchell Rowton (Mar 16)
- RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] Young, Randy (Mar 17)
- RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] Shawn Jackson (Mar 18)
- RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] Shawn Jackson (Mar 18)
- RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] David Gillett (Mar 18)
- RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] Jef Feltman (Mar 19)
- Re: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] Andy Blair (Mar 19)
- RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] Shawn Jackson (Mar 19)
- RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] Shawn Jackson (Mar 19)
- Re: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] ~Kevin Davis³ (Mar 19)
- RE: FW: Legal? Road Runner proactive scanning.[Scanned] Shawn Jackson (Mar 23)
- The fallacy of analogies - Enough with throwing rocks at your windows! Burton M. Strauss III (Mar 23)