Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: Firewall for restricting ips based on dynamic acls


From: <Ajay.Mitra () iflexsolutions com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 00:24:59 +0530

Hi...Thanks for the response.
I am looking at exactly the same kind of firewall but want to configure it over win2k Advanced server. I apologize for 
not mentioning it in the first mail.
 
Regards,
Ajay

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Sebastian Reitenbach [mailto:reitenba () fh-brandenburg de] 
        Sent: Thu 12/30/2004 4:26 AM 
        To: security-basics () securityfocus com 
        Cc: 
        Subject: Re: Firewall for restricting ips based on dynamic acls
        
        

        hi ajay,
        
        i don't know for 100% what you mean with reading dynamic acl's, but maybe you
        want to look at the openbsd [1] firewall pf [2]. this higly flexible firewall
        handles dynamic tables onto which ip addresses can be dynamically added and
        removed by scripts and other tools.
        
        cheers
        buzz
        
        [1] http://www.openbsd.org
        [2] http://www.benzedrine.cx/pf.html
        
        Am Mittwoch, 29. Dezember 2004 03:02 schrieb Ajay.Mitra () iflexsolutions com:
        > Hi,
        >
        > I am trying to find a firewall which can read dynamic acl...restrict ips
        > which are not present in the acl. And available at modest price.
        >
        > If someone can help...
        >
        > Thanks in advance,
        > Ajay
        >
        >
        



DISCLAIMER:
This message contains privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the individual named.If you are 
not the intended recipient you should not disseminate,distribute,store,print, copy or deliver this message.Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your 
system.E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be 
intercepted,corrupted,lost,destroyed,arrive late or incomplete or contain viruses.The sender therefore does not accept 
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. 
If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.


Current thread: