Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: email gateway (transparent) - full transparent
From: Bartek Krajnik <bartek () indigo pl>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:45:36 +0100
On 13-11-2003 at 08:32:46PM +0100, arek () chelmnet pl wrote:
My problem is with my local users (about 3k LAN users in about 500 buildings), they send spam (viruses, worms etc) not using my MTA. I'm looking for transparent method (like redirect for transparent-proxy w3cache, squid) to force traffic on port 25 to go via my MTA.
Try commercial products like: http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/products/products.cfm?ProductID=164&EID=0 I don't know mks, but don't will be better to install client (on gateway) for virus server (on Your MTA) and scan messages in queues on gateway? http://www.obtuse.com/smtpd.html GPG-key-ID: 0x948DE45D - http://www.bartek.indigo.pl/public_key.txt Fingerprint: 95E9 8E2D 1801 7864 2244 6EAA 03E5 764D 948D E45D
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: email gateway (transparent), (continued)
- RE: email gateway (transparent) Shawn Jackson (Nov 13)
- email gateway (transparent) mig igen (Nov 13)
- RE: email gateway (transparent) Filip Maertens (Nov 13)
- RE: email gateway (transparent) - full transparent arek (Nov 14)
- Re: email gateway (transparent) - full transparent Philip Duldig (Nov 17)
- RE: email gateway (transparent) - full transparent arek (Nov 18)
- Re: email gateway (transparent) - full transparent Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Nov 19)
- RE: email gateway (transparent) - full transparent arek (Nov 20)
- RE: email gateway (transparent) - full transparent Joey Peloquin (Nov 21)
- RE: email gateway (transparent) - full transparent Kevin Saenz (Nov 21)
- RE: email gateway (transparent) - full transparent arek (Nov 14)
- Re: email gateway (transparent) - full transparent Bartek Krajnik (Nov 25)
- Re: email gateway (transparent) - full transparent Olaf Kilian (Nov 26)
- Re: email gateway (transparent) - full transparent Olaf Kilian (Nov 26)