Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark
From: "Ewgenij Sokolovski" <ewgenijkkg () gmx de>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:36:52 +0100
When the installed wireshark was working, was that one that was installed from a build directory that had your dissector in it and where lt-wireshark (or ./wireshark, which is the script that runs it) *did* work before you ran "make install"?
Yes! That was exactly the same directory. I installed my *pimped* wireshark version. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Anders Broman (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Anders Broman (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 14)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 10)