Wireshark mailing list archives
Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark
From: "Ewgenij Sokolovski" <ewgenijkkg () gmx de>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:50:02 +0100
Hello, guys. I'm investigating a quite strange issue with my Wireshark. When I start binary "lt-wireshark" everything is OK. When I start binary "wireshark", a new dissector I have written by myself is not launched at all. My question now is - what is actually the difference between "lt-wireshark" and "wireshark"? What the two files are for? Would really appreciate any help. Kind regards Ewgenij ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Anders Broman (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Anders Broman (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 14)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 10)