Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:06:28 -0800
On Jan 11, 2013, at 4:38 AM, "Ewgenij Sokolovski" <ewgenijkkg () gmx de> wrote:
CMakeLists.txt in ../epan or added to Custom.common.OK, that was the missing chain link :) Now it works! But what was the reason? Why did it still work with lt-wireshark???
When the installed wireshark was working, was that one that was installed from a build directory that had your dissector in it and where lt-wireshark (or ./wireshark, which is the script that runs it) *did* work before you ran "make install"? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Anders Broman (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Anders Broman (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 14)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 10)